Percieved control and academic achievment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Percieved control and academic achievment - Essay ExampleThey totalled to about 19 respondents. The findings also show that majority of the respondents have poor mental ability.Using the take to be 0.05 level of significance, F-statistics, and an Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, the df num observe is k-1, or 2 -1, or 1 and the df den value is T-k, or 50 - 2, or 48. So, with = 0.05, the critical value of F in this analysis of variance test was F0.05 (1, 48) = 251. Since computed F (FC) is less than Tabulated F (FT), Ho is accepted, which states that the Rotters LOCUS of Control scores and the number GPA of the selected respondents has no significant relationship.In other words, the result of the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) shows that the computed F, 0.103 is less than the tabular values of F-statistics, 251 at 0.05 degrees of freedom, 1, 48. This denotes that the GPA has no significant effect on the Rotters LOCUS of Control survey results.The resultant R square value is 0.002. T his is genuinely far from the point of reference value 1. This shows that the correlation is not on the normal curve distribution. So, it is interpreted as in truth pure positive correlation. In percentile (%), it is 0.2 which indicates that the Rotters LOCUS of Control scores and the norm GPA of the selected respondents has very minimal similarities.Furthermore, because the R square value of 0.002 is not close to the adjusted R square value of -0.019, this signifies that the regression model is not fit for the data. The very small positive correlation denotes that the Rotters LOCUS of Control scores is uncorrelated with the Average GPA of the selected respondents, it may be either large or small when the scores or frequency is large and vice versa. This further implies that there is no systematic trend in the Rotters LOCUS of Control scores and the Average GPA of the selected respondents.AppendicesScoreFrequencyPercentValid PercentCumulative PercentValid612.02.02.0736.06.08.0848 .08.016.0936.06.022.010918.018.040.011714.014.054.012510.010.064.013612.012.076.01436.06.082.01624.04.086.01712.02.088.018510.010.098.01912.02.0100.0Total50100.0100.0Note Column 2 and 3 were used for figure 1Average GPAFrequencyPercentValid PercentCumulative PercentValid124.04.04.02714.014.018.031020.020.038.041326.026.064.05612.012.076.06612.012.088.0736.06.094.0836.06.0100.0Total50100.0100.0Note Column 2 and 3 were used for figure 2Scores versus Average GPARegressionVariables